During his term as the Massachusett Governor, Mitt Romney created a “supercabinet” position that oversaw the state’s economic, consumer affairs and labor departments. The hope was coordinating their budgets and activities. (I smell BIG Government).
He also attempted to consolidate more power in the governor’s office through a major reorganization of the government structure but was rejected by the legislature.
Is Romney a little like Obama? I do believe he is. He sure is more left than I would like to see in office and he sure does like big government and control.

In 2002, Romney presented a plan to balance the budget without raising taxes. Romney also favored gambling as a way to help balance the Massachusetts deficit.
Upon entering office, Romney faced a $3 billion deficit. Facing an immediate fiscal shortfall, the governor asked the state legislature for emergency powers to make “9C” cuts to the fiscal year 2003 budget. Romney cut spending and restructured state government.
Romney, in concert with the legislature, created new fees, doubled fees for court filings, professional regulations, marriage licenses, and firearm licenses, and increased fees for many state licenses and services. In all 33 new fees were created, and 57 fees were increased, some that had not been adjusted in over a decade. Some of these fees included were service fees, such as charging businesses more to put up signs. Opponents said the reliance on fees sometimes imposed a hardship on those who could least afford them.
Romney increased the state gasoline delivery fee by 2 cents per gallon, generating about $60 million per year in additional revenue and raised the state gas tax to a total of 23 cents.
A windfall in capital gains tax revenue caused by a previously enacted capital gains tax increase reduced the deficit by $1.3 billion. Romney approved $128 million in tax changes such as sales tax from purchases on the Internet and raised another $181 million in additional business taxes in the next two years; businesses called these changes tax increases, but Romney defended them as the elimination of “loopholes”.
In 2002, the state passed a capital gains tax increase that was scheduled to take effect on May 1 of that year. A taxpayers’ group challenged the law in court, arguing that a tax increase must take effect at the beginning or end of a year, and in 2005 the Supreme Judicial Court ruled in their favor.
I would highly suggest taking a long hard look at Romney before casting your vote. If Romney is voted in, would could possibly have another Obama in office.
Please take careful consideration when voting and please make sure to vote.
Some information was taken from: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Governorship_of_Mitt_Romney